Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2015 12:35:38 +0000 From: krad <kraduk@gmail.com> To: Gabor Radnai <gabor.radnai@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Eric McCorkle <eric@metricspace.net> Subject: Re: EFI/ZFS Update: successful tests, need more complex vdevs Message-ID: <CALfReyfp6gsbD-x81cU7EX%2B4TM%2Bv7zVNLzFPeOVFDqoXjpq=Kg@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CABnVG=dcayeG7SwzZwv7wzDHqioVXo8uG-u=wW43S0VRJkeiTw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CABnVG=dcayeG7SwzZwv7wzDHqioVXo8uG-u=wW43S0VRJkeiTw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
is there not anyway freebsd could provide patched signed binaries outside the main distros for testing purposes, as it should be fairly straight forward to drop them in? I think you might be a much bigger audience for testing then? On 2 November 2015 at 19:16, Gabor Radnai <gabor.radnai@gmail.com> wrote: > Appreciate, thank you very much. I think my confusion is because the latest > patch you provided on the list > on *Fri Oct 23 11:19:07 UTC 2015* > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/attachments/20151023/db1ac571/attachment.bin > > is not a full patch but a diff to your original patch. Anyhow, I'm ok now > applying original patch and this latest diff everything seems fine > (apart that for some reason my server dislikes booting automatically from > the EFI partition, manually loading bootx64.efi works like charm. > but that's definitely nothing to do with your great work). > > Thanks. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CALfReyfp6gsbD-x81cU7EX%2B4TM%2Bv7zVNLzFPeOVFDqoXjpq=Kg>