From owner-cvs-all Tue Jul 25 12:17:51 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from feral.com (feral.com [192.67.166.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E109F37B9C8; Tue, 25 Jul 2000 12:17:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mjacob@feral.com) Received: from beppo.feral.com (beppo [192.67.166.79]) by feral.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA30506; Tue, 25 Jul 2000 12:17:38 -0700 Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 12:17:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Jacob Reply-To: mjacob@feral.com To: Matt Dillon Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc/sys rfork.2 In-Reply-To: <200007251850.LAA66749@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ????????? I am stone confused by this. I *KNOW* we had some song and dance about -stable moving ahead because -current was broken, but that model doesn't seem to have been actually followed. I'm confused. On Tue, 25 Jul 2000, Matt Dillon wrote: > dillon 2000/07/25 11:50:22 PDT > > Modified files: > lib/libc/sys rfork.2 > Log: > MFC 1.11.2.3 from -stable to -current > > Revision Changes Path > 1.14 +22 -7 src/lib/libc/sys/rfork.2 > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message