Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      12 Jun 2001 15:52:31 +0200
From:      Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
To:        Chris BeHanna <behanna@zbzoom.net>
Cc:        FreeBSD-Stable <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: Why is the STABLE branch not so stable anymore?
Message-ID:  <xzpbsntkdpc.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.32.0106112247580.32911-100000@topperwein.dyndns.org>
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.32.0106112247580.32911-100000@topperwein.dyndns.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Chris BeHanna <behanna@zbzoom.net> writes:
>     A 6-hour turnaround time is pretty frigging *AWESOME*, actually.
> I never cease to be amazed at the level of support there is for most
> open source software, given that no formal support agreement exists
> with the user base.

It's simple.  If we fuck up, we don't stand to lose our jobs - we
stand to lose our pride, our reputation, our self-esteem and the
respect of our peers.  That's pretty good motivation.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpbsntkdpc.fsf>