From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 26 01:35:19 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F39D916A4CE for ; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 01:35:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E97F43D4C for ; Sat, 26 Mar 2005 01:35:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gert.cuykens@gmail.com) Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a41so929178rng for ; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 17:35:18 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=S5q/UL8MPhmd2ICagSSY0Vq2mFHJabK0y1ThDMplfFUY5r6WmmIORTGUIXgZavC85rb/NRuL/t/yfNr+Z1l9ojlQXSBBwqsUJ5FoA1c3Bep6hYqNGAT8JsoM/SsFusaHLWycKRcf7R+38zlOKkYmGO8uCCnugFj5OrjSG3IYjvI= Received: by 10.38.10.3 with SMTP id 3mr707343rnj; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 17:35:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.38.74.23 with HTTP; Fri, 25 Mar 2005 17:35:17 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 02:35:17 +0100 From: Gert Cuykens To: Christopher Nehren In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20050325234152.GA12816@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> <20050326002311.GA18807@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: .cshrc X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gert Cuykens List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Mar 2005 01:35:19 -0000 On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 00:53:45 +0000 (UTC), Christopher Nehren wrote: > > Is .profile read by every shell ? > > No. If it was, users who disdain Bourne shells (like sh, ksh, zsh, and > the ever-popular bash) for whatever reason (and the reasons are myriad, > IMO) wouldn't be able to log in. This was alluded to in my post wherein > I mentioned that sh probably wouldn't be able to read the .cshrc file > (depending upon what you've placed in it). > I would like one with allot of colors and a double tab completion that shows every command or file :) Is bash the only one that does that or can csh do that too ?