From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Jun 30 22: 0: 8 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.ORG [204.216.27.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B5D215674 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 22:00:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.2) id WAA19929; Wed, 30 Jun 1999 22:00:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 30 Jun 1999 22:00:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199907010500.WAA19929@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Tim Vanderhoek Subject: Re: ports/12463: Update: Fvwm2 to 2.2.2 Reply-To: Tim Vanderhoek Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR ports/12463; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Tim Vanderhoek To: "Jason C. Wells" Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/12463: Update: Fvwm2 to 2.2.2 Date: Thu, 1 Jul 1999 00:57:29 -0400 On Wed, Jun 30, 1999 at 04:29:24PM -0400, Jason C. Wells wrote: > > Please change pkg/COMMENT for this pr to: > "A popular virtual window manager for XWindows" How would you feel about removing the unnecessary article "A". ie. "Popular virtual window manager for XWindows" The "A " seems to add very little to the comment. [Answer with either a "good idea" or "bad idea" type answer, please, not "I don't care" --- I'm trying to decide whether its good idea or not to run a script through all the pkg/COMMENTs removing useless articles]. > If you are feeling froggy and are flame proof use: > "The one true virtual window manager for all unixen" Tempting, very tempting... ;-) -- This is my .signature which gets appended to the end of my messages. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message