From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 20 10:18:40 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 592B61065670; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 10:18:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wenheping@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD7288FC13; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 10:18:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so391565iyb.13 for ; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 02:18:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=HAicxKS3MihpR3p7DZ6n3V+0pvlv+xS2HJtNYEZClfs=; b=vk7q/VtjjNUf81NjJBCnzu9f1whwa5UM2HXH4zlWWc6uBkZPvC/HfS7ky0BWEZqunN 1h/2eYLGRyMZfEsJbM9Dcdiq3KLAi/Wl/au5pTKA8zyrvGAMpfSgvfw0chw3mMhdwZ7X ovGt57VX+XrROHHp6YJ/xzoeFUyluWigVP8QI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=fmiAXvrl6e5gUullS8gHkG5LSndeQH/tfYYTnenudGZWu7bo+g+iyHm6mTVzCqIepa SdrO4FOr2RnW93Kj7R0ItVkU0G1RFz1LBDO8hyQ8+TMQicMgcBJ0qin7hQlP/g//FcOe h2fSZqTvjDxgzf3U4vv+fMQuHS0MyX8AI0lHg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.15.132 with SMTP id k4mr2260395iba.60.1295518719188; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 02:18:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.26.17 with HTTP; Thu, 20 Jan 2011 02:18:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20110120092507.GA82095@FreeBSD.org> References: <201101180845.p0I8jubc025995@repoman.freebsd.org> <70181583@serv3.int.kfs.ru> <20110120092507.GA82095@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:18:39 +0800 Message-ID: From: wen heping To: Alexey Dokuchaev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Boris Samorodov , Wen Heping , cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/moinmoin Makefile distinfo pkg-plist X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 10:18:40 -0000 2011/1/20 Alexey Dokuchaev : > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 01:32:16PM +0300, Boris Samorodov wrote: >> Wen Heping writes: >> >> > wen =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 2011-01-18 08:45:56 UTC >> > >> > =C2=A0 - Add license >> ----- >> > +LICENSE=3D =C2=A0 GPLv2 >> > +LICENSE_FILE=3D =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0${WRKSRC}/docs/licenses/COPYING >> ----- >> >> This is a general question, just picking this commit up. >> Should we provide the license text if it's a standard one? >> My vote is "no"... > > I would also said no. =C2=A0In fact, I find it abusive and wrong to use t= he > LICENSE_FILE at all for standard licenses. =C2=A0Then problem is that peo= ple > don't care, and we (ports people) do not do enough to educate them, and > even sometimes encourage mistakes by committing bad submissions. > > ./danfe > I do not think it is a wrong use when set LICENSE_FILE even it's a standard= one. What is its harm ? It could at least help the user to find the license file easily. wen