Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 10:54:33 -0500 From: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org> To: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r382492 - head/Mk/Uses Message-ID: <5516CEB9.3090600@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201503281450.t2SEoNmd076083@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201503281450.t2SEoNmd076083@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --8OvJFquTROpxHRdlNOfgOGWQC2WC8kcPU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 3/28/2015 9:50 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Author: bapt > Date: Sat Mar 28 14:50:22 2015 > New Revision: 382492 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/382492 > QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r382492/ >=20 > Log: > Add USES=3Dmetaport to simplify writing metaports >=20 > Added: > head/Mk/Uses/metaport.mk (contents, props changed) >=20 > Added: head/Mk/Uses/metaport.mk > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D > --- /dev/null 00:00:00 1970 (empty, because file is newly added) > +++ head/Mk/Uses/metaport.mk Sat Mar 28 14:50:22 2015 (r382492) > @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ > +# $FreeBSD$ > +# > +# Sets the default variables to handle metaports > +# > +# Feature: metaport > +# Usage: USES=3Dmetaport > +# > +# Take no arguments > + > +.if !defined(_INCLUDE_USES_METAPORT_MK) > +_INCLUDE_USES_METAPORT_MK=3D yes > + > +MASTER_SITES=3D # > +DISTFILES=3D # > +EXTRACT_ONLY=3D # > +NO_BUILD=3D yes > +NO_INSTALL=3D yes > +NO_MTREE=3D yes > + > +.endif >=20 Now that I quickly flew past this, I think these should all be ?=3D. I've= had to make meta ports at work that did include 1 few files. I know they are not quite technically "meta packages" at that point but IMHO they still qualify. I'm not strong on this opinion though. --=20 Regards, Bryan Drewery --8OvJFquTROpxHRdlNOfgOGWQC2WC8kcPU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVFs65AAoJEDXXcbtuRpfPZGIH/0cX3XKWRGh0zVgPtEwtbVQS DmLR189GqtaaGwyJzln1bRQxlr9af63aNWXaPkTVL56Txbsn45nhCK3oqKJY5Udo 6UgPbsEaSuWn69uqSY9FkjEggWInojc6RRG+PYNJxcuKQ3cUfvbgJoC96bde/viz vUkTTT+7yDgqzqOFlsUZnoWI/5Z2pglgB6bzmXAnLvkkZ1ntuD3nD58AwZWKV3aK iTMqTRc1dpE120+Po9yc0A01PZW9lsmRUMtbRepiHxakK+jIioibXbgUPF8JmpNa WAzmnPqzt0eYLE4CmzDWFd2N8Txn6XykULBdSK3lToydHiHC9nMxcP0z7nbswEA= =x/52 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8OvJFquTROpxHRdlNOfgOGWQC2WC8kcPU--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5516CEB9.3090600>