From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 25 05:09:17 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE60516A417 for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 05:09:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from punosevac@math.arizona.edu) Received: from smtp224.math.arizona.edu (smtp224.math.arizona.edu [128.196.224.202]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC6CD13C459 for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2007 05:09:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from punosevac@math.arizona.edu) Received: from Debian-exim by smtp224.math.arizona.edu with local-bsmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IDZ7j-00041m-AT for freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:09:24 -0700 Received: from 71-220-136-74.tcsn.qwest.net ([71.220.136.74] helo=[192.168.0.3]) by smtp224.math.arizona.edu with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1IDZ7Z-00041T-Ek; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:09:13 -0700 Message-ID: <46A6DA30.7020201@math.arizona.edu> Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:05:52 -0700 From: Predrag Punosevac User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (Windows/20070716) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nikola Lecic , freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org References: <46A6CE7D.5050509@math.arizona.edu> <200707250335.l6P3ZKnc025836@smtpclu-7.EUnet.yu> In-Reply-To: <200707250335.l6P3ZKnc025836@smtpclu-7.EUnet.yu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Outgoing-Spam-Score: -5.9 (-----) Cc: Subject: Re: powerdot X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2007 05:09:18 -0000 Nikola Lecic wrote: > On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 21:15:57 -0700 > Predrag Punosevac wrote: > > >> Nikola Lecic wrote: >> >>> Nobody thinks that TeXLive shouldn't be ported :) What do you mean >>> by "light version"? >>> >>> >>> >> One of original arguments for not porting TeXLive was that the >> program is simply to big >> (over 1Gb). Having downloaded TeXLive (binaries only) on several >> occasions for my friends over DSL I can confess that that is really >> the case (at least 3 hours for binaries over 1.5Mps DSL connection) . >> > > Binaries are 38M: > > % du -sh /usr/local/texlive/2007/bin/i386-freebsd/ > 38M /usr/local/texlive/2007/bin/i386-freebsd/ > > (~270 binaries). > > texmf-dist/: common, platform-independent resources: 972M > texmf-doc/: 136M > > >> I purpose that the program be ported in the style of Gnome. Light >> strip down version which would >> be the minimal fully functional configuration, >> "full" (English language) version with all bells, and then another >> port with the support for different languages, another port Music >> part of the TeXLive etc. >> > > Well, yes, of course, this is the way it was done where TeXLive was > ported (OpenBSD, Debian...): as modularised as possible. > > >> The idea of dividing the port is just >> initial and should be more carefully considered by the people who >> know more about various aspects of TeX that I do not use. >> > > What makes you think they are not aware of this? > > Nikola Lečić > Well, I hope that they are aware but it seems that nobody is acting on these issues(or at least not fast enough).