Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 19:51:19 -0500 From: Scott Lambert <lambert@lambertfam.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: postfix port version numbering -- suggestions wanted Message-ID: <20040429005119.GA888@laptop.lambertfam.org> In-Reply-To: <20040428191318.GA65852@spamcop.net> References: <AC962F6D-9940-11D8-B6E4-000A9578CFCC@khera.org> <20040428191318.GA65852@spamcop.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 03:13:18PM -0400, Jim Trigg wrote: > On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 02:20:05PM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote: > > Currently there are three postfix ports: postfix1, postfix, and > > postfix-current. Obviously, enough people still run postfix 1.x to > > need a postfix1 port. So my thought is to make a postfix20 port for > > the now old 2.0 line, and have the postfix port be the 2.1 release. > > > > What do other postfix users out there think? I'm holding off > > submitting the PR's until we decide on what to do. > > I don't think it's necessary. There isn't a large effort involved in > moving from 2.0.x to 2.1 the way there is in moving from 1.x to 2.x. I agree. It just doesn't seem to be worth the effort. -- Scott Lambert KC5MLE Unix SysAdmin lambert@lambertfam.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040429005119.GA888>