Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2012 09:03:35 -0500 From: Alejandro Imass <ait@p2ee.org> To: Dick Hoogendijk <dick@nagual.nl> Cc: Eric Masson <emss@free.fr>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports vs packages Message-ID: <CAHieY7TFKCOgTG0GCjLPKa0oDiqz5oedba%2BUr-E4VbbrA9q6Fw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4F0C2B44.7050408@nagual.nl> References: <CAJxePN%2BWrr6K83RGFGERzJGUXc24i95BemPOgxqAJW_2Lsfjpg@mail.gmail.com> <07e401cccefb$364338b0$a2c9aa10$@fisglobal.com> <CAHieY7RL5wf=Tk7-9KafudTFYbTHtXh9Ap9rDyVCM=5qEFN4ew@mail.gmail.com> <083a01cccf07$79fd35e0$6df7a1a0$@fisglobal.com> <CAJxePNKkFGbfcvUV=SPSV8PiQ4aqpc54fYOCLb6kbn_R84xqrw@mail.gmail.com> <4F0C0EFC.401@nagual.nl> <8662gjrdqd.fsf@srvbsdfenssv.interne.associated-bears.org> <4F0C2B44.7050408@nagual.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 7:12 AM, Dick Hoogendijk <dick@nagual.nl> wrote: > Op 10-1-2012 12:36, Eric Masson schreef: > >> Dick Hoogendijk<dick@nagual.nl> =A0writes: >> >> Hi, >> >>> As I write in another reply: that's true and totally stupid imo. >> >> *You* think it's stupid. > > Yes, as I wrote: "stupid imo" > But thanks again for your reply. You may be right but I still feel it's > better to *have* the pache module and disable it than to *have to* use po= rts > just to get it. > IMO it's stupid as well and I second Dick's opinion. The module doesn't hurt anyone, and reduces confusion. I think that PHP is still more heavily deployed on mod_php than on anything else. The Apache module should be built by default unless there is a really strong argument as to why it shouldn't. --=20 Alejandro Imass
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHieY7TFKCOgTG0GCjLPKa0oDiqz5oedba%2BUr-E4VbbrA9q6Fw>