From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 23:15:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 682F71065679; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 23:15:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lstewart@freebsd.org) Received: from lauren.room52.net (lauren.room52.net [210.50.193.198]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 273A88FC1E; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 23:15:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lawrence1.loshell.room52.net (ppp59-167-184-191.static.internode.on.net [59.167.184.191]) by lauren.room52.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2C2F17E87B; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 09:15:01 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4CA276F1.1080400@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 09:14:57 +1000 From: Lawrence Stewart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-AU; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100913 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wesley Shields References: <4C99BC37.6070400@freebsd.org> <20100928205629.GA93659@atarininja.org> In-Reply-To: <20100928205629.GA93659@atarininja.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on lauren.room52.net Cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: net/isc-dhcp41-client, dhclient-script and DHCPv6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 23:15:03 -0000 On 09/29/10 06:56, Wesley Shields wrote: > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 06:20:07PM +1000, Lawrence Stewart wrote: >> Hi Wesley, >> >> I've been playing with DHCPv6 and in doing so, ran into an apparent >> problem with the net/isc-dhcp41-client port. > > I've switched to using the script provided by upstream. Thanks for > noticing this and sorry for the delay in response. No worries at all and thanks for looking into this. I appreciate it. Cheers, Lawrence