From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Jun 3 13: 5:32 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from femme.listmistress.org (bgp01560565bgs.gambrl01.md.comcast.net [68.50.32.109]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBB6E37B404; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 13:05:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from femme.listmistress.org (trish@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by femme.listmistress.org (8.12.3/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g53K4Fd5001147; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 16:04:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (trish@localhost) by femme.listmistress.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) with ESMTP id g53K45jZ001144; Mon, 3 Jun 2002 16:04:07 -0400 (EDT) X-Authentication-Warning: femme.listmistress.org: trish owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 16:04:04 -0400 (EDT) From: Trish Lynch X-X-Sender: To: Julian Elischer Cc: <.@babolo.ru>, Maxim Sobolev , Subject: Re: Splitting up ports. In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20020603160336.H482-100000@femme.listmistress.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 3 Jun 2002, Julian Elischer wrote: > > If the group declares that EVENTUALLY they would like to support > 2 > levels then everyone can keep this in mind as they work on things.. > > another possibility is to use the current scheme as teh 'inode' level and > have a totally separate 'directory layer' that has a different > organisation using symlinks . > > > Which is similar to how the packages and distfiles layout is, right? -Trish -- Trish Lynch trish@bsdunix.net FreeBSD The Power to Serve Ecartis Core Team trish@listmistress.org http://www.freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message