Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 11:19:03 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> To: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/bind9 - Imported sources Message-ID: <20040920181903.GB95778@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20040920140744.163da930@localhost> References: <200409190130.i8J1UPZN059043@repoman.freebsd.org> <20040920174914.GA91871@dragon.nuxi.com> <20040920140744.163da930@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 02:07:44PM -0400, Tom Rhodes wrote: > On Mon, 20 Sep 2004 10:49:14 -0700 > "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 01:30:25AM +0000, Tom Rhodes wrote: > > > trhodes 2004-09-19 01:30:25 UTC > > > FreeBSD src repository > > > src/contrib/bind9 - Imported sources > > > Update of /home/ncvs/src/contrib/bind9 > > > In directory repoman.freebsd.org:/tmp/cvs-serv58982 > > > > > > Log Message: > > > Vender import of BIND 9.3.0rc4. > > > > > > Status: > > > > > > Vendor Tag: ISC > > > Release Tags: BIND_9_3_0_RC4 > > > > > > N src/contrib/bind9/CHANGES > > > > Why wasn't this imported into src/contrib/bind, following 8 years of SOP? > > Please reimport into the proper directory. > > I was only following the requests/plans of Doug, Jacques, DES, Ken > Smith and others who asked that BIND9 be placed in it's own > directory due to the large differences between BIND8 and > BIND9. This should have been discussed in public if we were to break with 8 years of standard operating practice. How long is src/contrib/bind going to stick around? Why does it need to exist at the same time as src/contrib/bind9? -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040920181903.GB95778>