From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue May  2 20:00:15 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id UAA25422
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 2 May 1995 20:00:15 -0700
Received: from cs.weber.edu (cs.weber.edu [137.190.16.16])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id UAA25411
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 2 May 1995 20:00:07 -0700
Received: by cs.weber.edu (4.1/SMI-4.1.1)
	id AA10181; Tue, 2 May 95 20:53:19 MDT
From: terry@cs.weber.edu (Terry Lambert)
Message-Id: <9505030253.AA10181@cs.weber.edu>
Subject: Re: BPF nonfunctional?
To: witr@rwwa.com (Robert Withrow)
Date: Tue, 2 May 95 20:53:18 MDT
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: <199505030240.WAA00457@rwwa.com> from "Robert Withrow" at May 2, 95 10:40:22 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4dev PL52]
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> 
> Is it safe to say the BPF is not-ready-for-prime-time in
> FBSD2.0R?  When I compile it in my networking ceases to
> function...

There was a recent discussion about it not being supported for some
cards and rarpd needing it.

What card are you using?


					Terry Lambert
					terry@cs.weber.edu
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.