Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 10:35:05 +0100 From: Torsten Zuehlsdorff <tz@FreeBSD.org> To: Stefan Esser <se@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Ports ML <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>, tatsuki_makino@hotmail.com Subject: Re: Working on FLAVOR support in portmaster Message-ID: <7693b311-3228-a6d6-ea00-14f6ce18b59c@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <e433671c-13b1-26fa-c2e3-550b1a9e52c0@freebsd.org> References: <CAN6yY1ujLFdKpuG4Rxz%2Bfww9gAxTBaY14iCB7RFTkh-oVB1%2B9A@mail.gmail.com> <KL1PR0601MB19922BB1EBA15687D47C4CE2FA3C0@KL1PR0601MB1992.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com> <e433671c-13b1-26fa-c2e3-550b1a9e52c0@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Aloha Stefan, On 05.12.2017 08:35, Stefan Esser wrote: > Am 05.12.17 um 00:43 schrieb Tatsuki Makino: >> By the way, where is the clever way to update to flavor? >> I am using portmaster. > > I'm working on FLAVOR support in portmaster. My version did already build > all updated ports, the FLAVOR parameter is passed to build sub-processes, > but there is still some confusion between multiple flavored versions of the > same port (installing the py27 version wants to deinstall the py36 version > and vice versa), which I still have to fix. Great news. I was starting today and just read your email. Lucky me :D > My work version has all non PKG_NG support stripped, but that is mainly to > not waste effort fixing irrelevant sub-routines. > > Is it acceptable, to have portmaster stop supporting the old package system? > AFAIK, there is no way that a modern ports tree with flavor support works > with a non-PKG_NG infrastructure? This was something i aimed for in portmaster 2 since many changes were very subtle and there is no test-suite. But if there are some volunteers to test, i'm fine with it right now. Greetings, Torsten -- Support me at: https://www.patreon.com/TorstenZuehlsdorff
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?7693b311-3228-a6d6-ea00-14f6ce18b59c>