Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2016 20:29:25 +0000 From: Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Replies to spam Message-ID: <20161203202925.2088c4436589021710e6ea29@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1612030904550.87845@wonkity.com> References: <20161124123456.056654ff@archlinux.localdomain> <20161124171051.GA32472@becker.bs.l> <CAOLAi32P9VifQJrKAtovEpxg-Vv_XZXqo=nYR37aYwy9=Wt1Xw@mail.gmail.com> <ff50c697-d4f8-45b9-b5ba-9a37af88b73a@unixarea.de> <3E.0D.19237.9CB8A385@dnvrco-omsmta01> <20161127085920.3dc07007@moonstudio> <CAHAXwYAJnKVRCi0%2Btf63g7sEKDVA%2BVKWTRVBe4H43YjjnZqcNQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1612030904550.87845@wonkity.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 09:14:51 -0700 (MST) Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> wrote: > The volume of posts to -questions from new users has not been very high > for years. To me, that does not seem like a compelling reason to keep > the list open to posting without subscription. The policy along with the reply-all convention is common to all the FreeBSD lists AFAIK and is convenient for the occasional question to the more specialised lists. -- Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20161203202925.2088c4436589021710e6ea29>