From owner-freebsd-bugs Sun Sep 17 11:34:41 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1A7737B423 for ; Sun, 17 Sep 2000 11:34:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 797621C6B; Sun, 17 Sep 2000 14:34:39 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2000 14:34:39 -0400 From: Bill Fumerola To: Garrett Wollman Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: i386/21329: change to allow vm86 interrupt calls from userland Message-ID: <20000917143439.X47559@jade.chc-chimes.com> References: <200009171750.KAA24874@freefall.freebsd.org> <200009171831.OAA57802@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <200009171831.OAA57802@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>; from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu on Sun, Sep 17, 2000 at 02:31:12PM -0400 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.3-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, Sep 17, 2000 at 02:31:12PM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote: > < said: > > > I think [the ``suggest parentheses warning''] gcc's roundabout way > > of encouraging the practice of explicit checks. > > Actually, it's GCC's way of saying, ``Are you sure you really meant > `assignment' and not `test for equality' there?'' Ahhhhh, that makes even more sense. -- Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chimes, Inc. billf@chimesnet.com / billf@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message