From owner-freebsd-current Tue Aug 24 21:31:23 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (GndRsh.dnsmgr.net [198.145.92.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0A311504A; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 21:31:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd@localhost) by gndrsh.dnsmgr.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id VAA41950; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 21:29:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <199908250429.VAA41950@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: Softupdates reliability? In-Reply-To: from "Brian F. Feldman" at "Aug 24, 1999 05:39:56 pm" To: green@FreeBSD.ORG (Brian F. Feldman) Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 21:29:50 -0700 (PDT) Cc: richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Tobin), syssgm@detir.qld.gov.au (Stephen McKay), jeremyp@gsmx07.alcatel.com.au (Peter Jeremy), freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > On Tue, 24 Aug 1999, Richard Tobin wrote: > > > > > Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x580 Stepping=0 > > > > > You have one of the first K6-2s off the line. There were definite problems > > > with these, and as such, they were specially distinguished by having 66 > > > printed on top. > > > > I have a 0x580 which has had no problems at all. I'm pretty certain > > it doesn't have 66 stamped on it. Are they all supposed to have this, > > or were they tested and the dodgy ones stamped 66? > > It must be the latter. My 0x580 had the 66, so it must be that the dodgy > ones got labelled 66 and not all the 0x580s were defective. The original K6-2's off the line where all 100MHz parts, it was later when AMD found that some people where sticking these in 66MHz boards and trying to run them with a 66MHz FSB and having troubles that AMD started to test the parts for 66MHz operation, they had to make some changes in the I/O buffers and then qualify a new part number and those are the ones stamped 66. Aka AMD 6K86-2-P300/66 vs AMD 6K86-2-P300/100 for those who know what a real AMD part number is. To the best of my knowledge no 0x580 stepping 0 chip is qualified by AMD to run with a 66MHz FSB. -- Rod Grimes - KD7CAX - (RWG25) rgrimes@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message