From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 05:49:10 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79C3D16A4BF for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 05:49:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (storm.FreeBSD.org.uk [194.242.157.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9060E43FEA for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 05:49:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: from storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (Ugrondar@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by storm.FreeBSD.org.uk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h85Cn6P2016238; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 13:49:06 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) Received: (from Ugrondar@localhost)h85Cn5gn016237; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 13:49:05 +0100 (BST) X-Authentication-Warning: storm.FreeBSD.org.uk: Ugrondar set sender to mark@grondar.org using -f Received: from grondar.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])h85Ckaqi037611; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 13:46:36 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mark@grondar.org) From: Mark Murray Message-Id: <200309051246.h85Ckaqi037611@grimreaper.grondar.org> To: Bill Moran In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 05 Sep 2003 08:21:58 EDT." <3F587FE6.6060107@potentialtech.com> Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 13:46:36 +0100 Sender: mark@grondar.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,FROM_NO_LOWER,IN_REP_TO, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES version=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ugly Huge BSD Monster X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 12:49:10 -0000 Bill Moran writes: > My point here is that it's not the GPL that's causing the problems, it's > the legal system, and the copanies that try to use it as a revenue stream. > As long as the legal system allows people to file lawsuits as a method of > generating income (as opposed to actually protecting themselves) there will > always be the danger of _any_ license, copyright, or agreement of any kind > creating a lawsuit. Very strong agreement. I'm getting more than somewhat sick of folks ("one-product-wonders") who produce one Album/Idea/BetterMousetrap and spend the rest of their lives in lawsuits, hunting down violators (real and imagined) rather than producing more. Lawsuits are how you _defend_, not how you _conduct_. M -- Mark Murray iumop ap!sdn w,I idlaH