From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Nov 18 16:21:47 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA09682 for freebsd-ports-outgoing; Wed, 18 Nov 1998 16:21:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA09658 for ; Wed, 18 Nov 1998 16:21:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id TAA02677; Wed, 18 Nov 1998 19:20:57 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1998 19:20:57 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <199811190020.TAA02677@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Ben Hutchinson Cc: Garrett Wollman , FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: /etc/rc.d, and changes to /etc/rc? In-Reply-To: <19981119001751.D18407@xfiles.org.uk> References: <19981118014446.C15587@xfiles.org.uk> <19981118191628.A18022@xfiles.org.uk> <199811181928.OAA01685@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <19981119001751.D18407@xfiles.org.uk> Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org < said: > Wouldn't that make the current scripts behave a little strangely when > invoked with the stop argument? >> There's no need for an extra directory; just get the ports maintainers >> to create correct scripts. No. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same wollman@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message