From owner-freebsd-net Sun Jul 7 22:35: 5 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A701737B401 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 22:35:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C67F43E64 for ; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 22:35:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bright@elvis.mu.org) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192) id 5B115AE39D; Sun, 7 Jul 2002 22:35:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 7 Jul 2002 22:35:01 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein To: Jonathan Lemon Cc: silby@silby.com, net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: the incredible shrinking socket Message-ID: <20020708053501.GR97638@elvis.mu.org> References: <200207080447.g684l2t01700@prism.flugsvamp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200207080447.g684l2t01700@prism.flugsvamp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org * Jonathan Lemon [020707 21:48] wrote: > > I do have a smaller TIME_WAIT structure done; it even throws the socket > away since it isn't needed. The savings are currently about 500 bytes, > and I can and also perform some other savings in the general case. > > I think Alfred was just trying to get his changes done first before I got > around to committing what I have. :-) :-) :-) (It's currently in p4) pfft, actually your return motivated me enough to try something I've been meaning to try. :) -- -Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org] 'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.' Tax deductible donations for FreeBSD: http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message