Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 15:39:32 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-2?B?TWlsb/IgUGFwZb7taw==?= <mmp@actinet.cz> To: <freebsd-java@freebsd.org> Subject: javavmwrapper - JVM order question Message-ID: <F56E643D3EB3437C96AEFE03374AA799@nb1>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, I have problem/question regarding the order of JVMs determined by javavmwrapper when no JAVA* environment variables are set. When I do not have installed ports, the javavmwrapper determines the JVM according to /usr/local/etc/javavms. However when the ports are installed, the order is determined according to /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.java.mk. The problem is that each scenario gives different result. I would expect the javavmwrapper to be consistent - to use always /usr/local/etc/javavms and use bsd.java.mk as fallback when /usr/local/etc/javavms is not available. Should we change/fix javavmwrapper? What do you think? Thank you in advance, Milon -- mmp@actinet.cz
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?F56E643D3EB3437C96AEFE03374AA799>