Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 6 Mar 2003 10:10:57 +0100
From:      Gunnar Flygt <gunnar.flygt@sr.se>
To:        Eric Anholt <eta@lclark.edu>
Cc:        FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: XFree86 4.3.0
Message-ID:  <20030306091057.GB86982@sr.se>
In-Reply-To: <1046940758.611.29.camel@leguin>
References:  <20030305151914.GB58739@sr.se> <1046883464.635.26.camel@leguin> <200303052336.47779.wes@softweyr.com> <1046940758.611.29.camel@leguin>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 12:52:38AM -0800, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 23:36, Wes Peters wrote:
> > On Wednesday 05 March 2003 08:57, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2003-03-05 at 07:19, Gunnar Flygt wrote:
> > > > I find it working very fine on my troublesome 5.0-CURRENT
> > > > box. I've had big problems for some weeks getting 4.2
> > > > to work. I gave up the other day, but 4.3.0 worked
> > > > straight "out of the box", if you can say so after a
> > > > portupgrade XFree86
> > > >
> > > > What didn't work was the installation of XFree86-FontServer
> > > > but I can live without that, I hope.
> > >
> > > Okay, got that fixed, it'll be in the -8 diff.  (got to run to class).
> > > Thanks!
> > 
> > Is this working with the nvidia driver?  I gotta track down that PCI TNT2 
> > card for my -current machine...
> 
> Are you talking about the binary driver?  If it's a proper XFree86
> module and XFree86 didn't screw up compatibility (I don't think they
> did), it should continue working, but it could do things that would
> prevent it from working in a new server.
> 
> I haven't tested cards besides the radeon due to lack of time so far.
> 
> The -9 diff is up (http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/X/files.html) and I
> haven't had any reports of problems with it so far.  If you get X 4.3.0
> working with it in the next couple of days, it would be great if people
> could mail me and mention what card, if they had to change anything from
> a 4.2.0 installation to get it to work, and briefly how they've tested
> it (i.e. started up gnome2 and did something, not just "it built" or
> "startx works")

I did a "dirty" thing and just ran the new patch on top of the
already patched system. Got some complaints that the patch was
there already, and was it OK. So I answered yes to all of it and
the patch applied on the missing parts. And since the system was
updated yesterday with the -7 patch, it was a few parts left.
XFree86-FontServer was one of them, and when I run
`portupgrade XFree86-FontServer` it does nothing, no upgrade.

Any suggestions? All the other parts are working though, except
for xdpyinfo which gives a lot of output but gives this strange
output:

# xdpyinfo
name of display:    :0.0
version number:    11.0
vendor string:    The XFree86 Project, Inc
vendor release number:    0
XFree86 version: 0.0.0
-- cut --

This is a 4.7-STABLE machine or should I say 4.8-RC which it is.

By the way /var/log/Xfree86.0.log says:

XFree86 Version 4.3.0
Release Date: 27 February 2003
X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0, Release 6.6
Build Operating System: FreeBSD 4.8-RC i386 [ELF] 
Build Date: 05 March 2003


-- 
Gunnar Flygt, SR

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030306091057.GB86982>