Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:06:36 +0200
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org>
To:        cpghost <cpghost@cordula.ws>
Cc:        FreeBSD-Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Auto-saving distfiles on freebsd
Message-ID:  <4887570C.50700@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20080723175903.7c5d0a9e@epia-2.farid-hajji.net>
References:  <792213D8B249EC1C41EA0662@utd65257.utdallas.edu>	<BMEDLGAENEKCJFGODFOCOENGCFAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com>	<20080723140714.GA24632@epia-2.farid-hajji.net>	<4887455E.6070504@FreeBSD.org> <20080723175903.7c5d0a9e@epia-2.farid-hajji.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
cpghost wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:51:10 +0200
> Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> 
>> cpghost wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 11:47:04PM -0700, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
>>>> Another problem with ports is that all of them like pulling the
>>>> original source from the author's site.  I've had a few where the
>>>> author released the code under GPL then a few years later lost
>>>> interest, stopped paying whatever ISP he had the main site for
>>>> the program at, and the porter also lost interest in the project
>>>> and never bothered obtaining the last available tarfile from
>>>> the authors site and uploading it to freebsd, then both
>>>> disappeared. Another one I can recall is the gated code, similar
>>>> issue.
>>> Why not add this to pointyhat scripts? Just upload a copy of every
>>> *new* distfile ever encountered from the author's page to freebsd
>>> (unless there are legal constraints not to do so, of course)?
>> We've regularly collected and published port distfiles for at least a 
>> decade (with increasingly higher frequency as disk space came to 
>> permit).  It may come as no surprise that Ted is talking out of his
>> ass again :)
>>
>> Kris
> 
> Ah, thanks! Good to know, and it's good news! :)
> 
> Will distfiles for ports that are no longer in the tree
> remain there as well, so that these ports can still be
> compiled with an older ports tree (yes, I know about the
> hairy security and dependency issues involved with old
> unmaintained and even dead ports...)?

Yes, as I mentioned in another reply it's been years since I have had to 
clean out old distfiles for space reasons, and there's no other need to 
do that so they will remain indefinitely.

Kris



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4887570C.50700>