From owner-freebsd-bugs Fri Jul 31 07:08:39 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA28560 for freebsd-bugs-outgoing; Fri, 31 Jul 1998 07:08:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from tim.xenologics.com (tim.xenologics.com [194.77.5.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA28553; Fri, 31 Jul 1998 07:08:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from seggers@semyam.dinoco.de) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by tim.xenologics.com (8.8.5/8.8.8) with UUCP id QAA25073; Fri, 31 Jul 1998 16:06:14 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from semyam.dinoco.de (semyam.dinoco.de [127.0.0.1]) by semyam.dinoco.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA13301; Fri, 31 Jul 1998 14:40:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from seggers@semyam.dinoco.de) Message-Id: <199807311240.OAA13301@semyam.dinoco.de> To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: bin/7453: libdialog: small change to DITEM_RECREATE behavior In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 30 Jul 1998 14:00:00 PDT." <199807302100.OAA17916@freefall.freebsd.org> Cc: seggers@semyam.dinoco.de Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 14:40:33 +0200 From: Stefan Eggers Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org After some more thinking about implications of this I finally found a case where these patches might make a program break. Looking for an alternative solution I found DITEM_REDRAW which seems to do what I need but is undocumented. Please close this PR. Stefan. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message