Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 11:01:48 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet ip_fw.c ip_fw.h src/sbin/ipfw ipfw.8 ipfw.c Message-ID: <200102131601.LAA30728@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> In-Reply-To: <51205.982073676@critter> References: <200102131412.f1DECdZ12064@freefall.freebsd.org> <51205.982073676@critter>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
<<On Tue, 13 Feb 2001 15:14:36 +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> said: > It would be more elegant to have multiple lists of ipfw rules: That is an excellent idea (and one that has been suggested before to no effect). Doing so would also improve the speed of access-list evaluation, and would make ipfw more comfortable for those who are used to (e.g.) Cisco per-interface access-lists. -GAWollman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200102131601.LAA30728>