From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org  Tue Oct 15 02:31:36 2019
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5A9614C16D
 for <freebsd-arm@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org>;
 Tue, 15 Oct 2019 02:31:36 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from matheus@eternamente.info)
Received: from hobbes.arroway.org (hobbes.arroway.org [173.199.118.77])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46sfZH4ybcz4TyX
 for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Tue, 15 Oct 2019 02:31:35 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from matheus@eternamente.info)
Received: from [10.1.1.11] (unknown [177.89.5.111])
 by hobbes.arroway.org (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6BFC21CA5BA
 for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 23:31:34 -0300 (BRT)
Received: from 10.1.3.102 (SquirrelMail authenticated user matheus)
 by 10.1.1.11 with HTTP; Mon, 14 Oct 2019 23:31:34 -0300
Message-ID: <7b75e2ed23e334878fbb3c1d585ffc51.squirrel@10.1.1.11>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 23:31:34 -0300
Subject: Choose between Raspberry Pi 4B 4GB and ROCKPro64
From: "Nenhum_de_Nos" <matheus@eternamente.info>
To: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.23 [SVN]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 46sfZH4ybcz4TyX
X-Spamd-Bar: /
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none;
 spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of matheus@eternamente.info has no SPF
 policy when checking 173.199.118.77) smtp.mailfrom=matheus@eternamente.info
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.83 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[];
 RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.95)[-0.953,0];
 FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[];
 NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.94)[-0.941,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain];
 TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[];
 PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org];
 AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1];
 RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[eternamente.info];
 HAS_X_PRIO_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[];
 RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[];
 R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+];
 ASN(0.00)[asn:20473, ipnet:173.199.116.0/22, country:US];
 MID_BARE_IP(2.00)[];
 IP_SCORE(-0.28)[asn: 20473(-1.35), country: US(-0.05)]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." <freebsd-arm.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2019 02:31:36 -0000

Hi,

I am about to buy a new arm box and would like it to be the most powerfull
I can get and still get to use FreeBSD somewhere not so far from now. I
know RPi4 is not supported right now, but as I have both RPi2B and RPi3B
and they run fine, my guess is the 4B will have its time also.

So it then comes down to 4B or ROCKPro64. I saw Pine64 images, but I could
not find much information about the ROCKPro64. I looked for some
benchmarks to know the faster CPU, and it looks like the RK3399 is a bit
faster. As the board has more features, I am asking here, if this has even
an answer, what board has better future in FreeBSD.

Thanks in advance :)

matheus