Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 18:38:42 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy <peterjeremy@optushome.com.au> To: Lev Serebryakov <lev@serebryakov.spb.ru> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Lev Serebryakov <lev@freebsd.org>, freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re[2]: ath: is here full list of supported chipsets and chipsets comparsion? Message-ID: <20081219073842.GB21468@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <1125132021.20081215232730@serebryakov.spb.ru> References: <1988001541.20081215103053@serebryakov.spb.ru> <49469ED0.5070308@freebsd.org> <1125132021.20081215232730@serebryakov.spb.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--zhXaljGHf11kAtnf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2008-Dec-15 23:27:30 +0300, Lev Serebryakov <lev@serebryakov.spb.ru> wro= te: > And using HEAD in production... Hmm. Is it good idea? That's really an individual decision. If you have the time, expertise and facilities to adequately regression test a HEAD snapshot using something similar to your production workload, and are willing to help resolve any problems you encounter, then there's no particular reason why you shouldn't run HEAD in production. Looking at it another way, the more people who stress 8-CURRENT in strange and varied ways (and help fix any problems they encounter), the better 8-RELEASE will be when it eventuates. --=20 Peter Jeremy Please excuse any delays as the result of my ISP's inability to implement an MTA that is either RFC2821-compliant or matches their claimed behaviour. --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAklLT4EACgkQ/opHv/APuIde+ACffL3vGeGU7B37czjSYvwqkzGy ZtsAn0gFhJ0dYfV025C5/0B01EYdfuSq =ACvm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zhXaljGHf11kAtnf--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081219073842.GB21468>