Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 5 Apr 2011 11:04:24 -0500
From:      Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com>
To:        Michael =?utf-8?Q?Gr=C3=BCnewald?= <michaelgrunewald@yahoo.fr>
Cc:        FreeBSD questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Place to install library of shell functions
Message-ID:  <20110405160424.GB68973@dan.emsphone.com>
In-Reply-To: <4D9B3403.2070704@yahoo.fr>
References:  <4D9B3403.2070704@yahoo.fr>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
In the last episode (Apr 05), Michael Grünewald said:
> today I come to you with what seems to be somehow pedantic question: where
> is the best place to install libraries of shell functions.
> 
> I read hier(4) carefully and it seems the correct place for this would 
> be somewhere under `/usr/local/share':
> 
>                  share/    architecture-independent files
> 
> On the base systems, many macros (make templates and groff macros) are
> actually installed under /usr/share.  However, the only library of shell
> functions I am aware of is `/etc/rc.subr', that landed on this funny
> location, probably to be pretty sure that this library is on the same
> filesystem as the scripts under /etc/rc.d.
>
> Several of the ports install shell scripts under `/usr/local/lib' that
> hier(4) devotes to ``shared and archive ar(1)-type libraries''.  These
> shell scripts are:

The zsh port installs all its helper scripts and functions into
/usr/local/share/zsh , and the portupgrade and portmaster ports insert their
zsh autocompletion functions into /usr/local/share/zsh/site-functions. 
Seems to work great.  Ports that install scripts into /usr/local/lib
probably either don't have separate script and lib install paths in their
makefile (tcl probably), or their scripts aren't meant to be called directly
(firefox).

-- 
	Dan Nelson
	dnelson@allantgroup.com



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110405160424.GB68973>