Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2014 21:40:16 +0100 From: John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st> To: Antoine Brodin <antoine@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r372684 - head/www/rejik Message-ID: <546A5D30.4020300@marino.st> In-Reply-To: <201411172031.sAHKVvih060140@svn.freebsd.org> References: <201411172031.sAHKVvih060140@svn.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/17/2014 21:31, Antoine Brodin wrote: > Author: antoine > Date: Mon Nov 17 20:31:56 2014 > New Revision: 372684 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/372684 > QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r372684/ > > Log: > Mark BROKEN (please don't resurect broken ports...) > I believe the port was a new effort -- it wasn't just a revival. Is failure to stage as non-root considered "broken" ? Wouldn't there be a lot of broken ports with that criteria? John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?546A5D30.4020300>