Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 13:22:31 -0200 From: JoaoBR <joao@matik.com.br> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: getting garbage faster using FreeBSD? Message-ID: <200702211322.31848.joao@matik.com.br> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.1070221194750.7164C-100000@gaia.nimnet.asn.au> References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.1070221194750.7164C-100000@gaia.nimnet.asn.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wednesday 21 February 2007 07:16, Ian Smith wrote: > =A0> It's primarily for item #1 that I hadn't mentioned this earlier, as = most > =A0> readers of -STABLE users are probably looking for a more scalable > solution. > > Scaleable? =A0Easy .. > > For 2.5" drives, a tack hammer does nicely. > For 3.5" to 5" drives, a claw hammer suffices. > For 14"? IBM disk packs a small sledge is optimal (if short of tanks!) guys I really enjoy this conversation! great stuff! I am just wondering why the "list sentinels" haven't mucked up yet ;) they= =20 almost shot at us for an issue much closer to the list subject. It was abou= t=20 spam and mail server so I am coming to the conclusion that the up-muckers=20 must be professional spammers which of course hate it when some discards=20 their tricks and they appearently are very interested in learning how to=20 destroy the evidence LOL ... or are they still under carnival-side-effects?= ?? here my contribution, even if most like the hard way, h2so4 would do it muc= h=20 smoother and has absolutely no scalability problems at all ;) and the=20 emergency package fit in the laptop case!=20 =2D-=20 Jo=E3o A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200702211322.31848.joao>