Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 02:08:40 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Component-based Operating System. Message-ID: <g6ln2e$c7k$1@ger.gmane.org> In-Reply-To: <488E4027.6070807@telenix.org> References: <Pine.NEB.4.64.0807281813020.5391@sdf.lonestar.org> <g6l4r9$hh1$1@ger.gmane.org> <488E4027.6070807@telenix.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig980478A284ECF9BAAF5736BF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Chuck Robey wrote: > Ivan Voras wrote: >> Juan Carlos Villalobos wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I am writing a paper on Component-based Operating Systems. I just >>> wanted to know if FreeBSD is an Operating System engineered based on >>> Components. >>> >>> I appreciate your input on this. >> "Components" is a wide, wide term. Since FreeBSD as an operating syste= m >> consists of separate libraries, headers, executables, and both the >> kernel and the userland have subsystems that are more-or-less autonomi= c >> and independent, you could say it's componentized. You need to be more= >> specific to get a more specific answer. >=20 > Yeah, that's true, but not very informative. Look, I don't follow OSes= all that > much anymore, but if I had to call up an OS that would be made up of mo= re of a > set of indenpendent pieces, I think I would choose the GNU Hurd OS. Fr= om > everything I read, it was never very successful, if one counts the abil= ity to > return some good throughput as being successful ... or, maybe they have= some > other characteristic which I'm not aware of. >=20 > Anyhow, the HURD (at least in concept) is far, far more of a component = based OS > than anything else I'm aware of is. It's an interesting concept, at th= e very > least, and I do understand it works. Yes, if the OP is talking about microkernels, FreeBSD isn't it. --------------enig980478A284ECF9BAAF5736BF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFIjl+NldnAQVacBcgRArx3AKDrXHITyDZmosyuxb9iOvR8KtrhqQCfabgo Md4huJ6/YnxE0NJuv4iR7Ng= =lKM2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig980478A284ECF9BAAF5736BF--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?g6ln2e$c7k$1>