Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 13 Mar 2015 09:56:02 -0400
From:      Paul Mather <paul@gromit.dlib.vt.edu>
To:        ticso@cicely.de
Cc:        "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>, Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely7.cicely.de>
Subject:   Re: BeagleBone slow inbound net I/O
Message-ID:  <2B027037-09EF-4552-9AE2-FC6E51090866@gromit.dlib.vt.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20150313131700.GA34648@cicely7.cicely.de>
References:  <20150311165115.32327c5a@ivory.wynn.com> <20150312133433.GB28385@cicely7.cicely.de> <20150312232641.4365263d@ivory.wynn.com> <E5292790-BAE2-41BC-BC76-A31C3C7ED76B@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> <20150313131700.GA34648@cicely7.cicely.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Mar 13, 2015, at 9:17 AM, Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely7.cicely.de> =
wrote:

> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 08:34:59AM -0400, Paul Mather wrote:
>> On Mar 12, 2015, at 11:26 PM, Brett Wynkoop <freebsd-arm@wynn.com> =
wrote:
>>=20
>>> Greeting-
>>>=20
>>> It is confirmed, the net I/O is much slower than reading from the SD
>>> card.  Here is another run of tar - pipe - tar, but this time the
>>> source is the sd card and the destination is still the USB zfs.
>>=20
>>=20
>> The Beaglebone uses a USB NIC so any I/O to/from SD card will be =
competing for resources and potentially slowing things down.
>=20
> No it does not.

My mistake; I was confusing it with the Raspberry Pi.  Network =
performance hasn't been too great on the Raspberry Pi in my experience.  =
Maybe it has improved lately, though.

Cheers,

Paul.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2B027037-09EF-4552-9AE2-FC6E51090866>