Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 22:23:22 +0200 From: "Alex T." <dioxinu@gmail.com> To: Tim Kientzle <kientzle@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports cross-compilers vs. native toolchain Message-ID: <CABt%2Bj0mB4w==h_SQ4YyDM24_wGOjcdZDK9T1N3DqjSkap0VkQw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <23CB6C35-9450-40BA-9FA3-37C44B328CA8@freebsd.org> References: <23CB6C35-9450-40BA-9FA3-37C44B328CA8@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
If I'm not mistaken, this port is not supposed to be built directly. Well, you may, but from what I see is that there one is supposed to build devel/arm-rtems-gcc, which in its turn defines mentioned variables and builds cross-gcc port. And it looks like the only pair of values is supported is arm/rtems. On 18 January 2012 07:30, Tim Kientzle <kientzle@freebsd.org> wrote: > What TGTARCH/TGTABI settings for cross-gcc > and cross-binutils match the native arm.arm cross > toolchain? > > Tim > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-arm@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-arm-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CABt%2Bj0mB4w==h_SQ4YyDM24_wGOjcdZDK9T1N3DqjSkap0VkQw>