Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 13 Apr 2016 19:08:26 -0500
From:      Brandon J. Wandersee <brandon.wandersee@gmail.com>
To:        Luciano Mannucci <luciano@vespaperitivo.it>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ZFS with errors
Message-ID:  <86fuupaw79.fsf@WorkBox.Home>
In-Reply-To: <86h9f5ax8e.fsf@WorkBox.Home>
References:  <3qlNxw33PhzRRqR@baobab.bilink.it> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1604131538480.14591@mail.fig.ol.no> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1604131548030.14591@mail.fig.ol.no> <3qlQxr34YhzRRqQ@baobab.bilink.it> <86h9f5ax8e.fsf@WorkBox.Home>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help

Brandon J. Wandersee writes:

> Even a one-disk ZFS stripe with the "copies"
> property raised is probably better than a large, multi-disk stripe.

...though I should add that a stripe of two completely identical disks
(make, model, size), while still vulnerable, will perform better than
one disk. ;)


-- 

::  Brandon J. Wandersee
::  brandon.wandersee@gmail.com
::  --------------------------------------------------
::  'The best design is as little design as possible.'
::  --- Dieter Rams ----------------------------------



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86fuupaw79.fsf>