Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 19:08:26 -0500 From: Brandon J. Wandersee <brandon.wandersee@gmail.com> To: Luciano Mannucci <luciano@vespaperitivo.it> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS with errors Message-ID: <86fuupaw79.fsf@WorkBox.Home> In-Reply-To: <86h9f5ax8e.fsf@WorkBox.Home> References: <3qlNxw33PhzRRqR@baobab.bilink.it> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1604131538480.14591@mail.fig.ol.no> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1604131548030.14591@mail.fig.ol.no> <3qlQxr34YhzRRqQ@baobab.bilink.it> <86h9f5ax8e.fsf@WorkBox.Home>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Brandon J. Wandersee writes: > Even a one-disk ZFS stripe with the "copies" > property raised is probably better than a large, multi-disk stripe. ...though I should add that a stripe of two completely identical disks (make, model, size), while still vulnerable, will perform better than one disk. ;) -- :: Brandon J. Wandersee :: brandon.wandersee@gmail.com :: -------------------------------------------------- :: 'The best design is as little design as possible.' :: --- Dieter Rams ----------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86fuupaw79.fsf>