Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 07 Nov 2003 21:02:41 +0900
From:      Hajimu UMEMOTO <ume@mahoroba.org>
To:        "Ari Suutari" <ari@suutari.iki.fi>
Cc:        freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: HEAD ip_fw2 ipsec b0rked
Message-ID:  <yge1xskfkta.wl%ume@mahoroba.org>
In-Reply-To: <001501c3a524$8bc40170$0235a8c0@raisa>
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.53.0311062137160.653@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net> <001501c3a524$8bc40170$0235a8c0@raisa>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
Hi,

>>>>> On Fri, 7 Nov 2003 13:44:45 +0200
>>>>> "Ari Suutari" <ari@suutari.iki.fi> said:

> 1) when someone fixes the
> panic: ipsec_gethist: obsolete API
>    in netinet/ip_fw2.c

ari>     I think that ipsec_gethist is being called from ip_input
ari>     also, so if it is going to be obsolete the new way can
ari>     be found there. Or do you mean that only
ari>     then second parameter is now obsolete ?

Yes, ipsec_gethist() was obsoleted and replaced by ipsec_getnhist()
during KAME merge.  Calling ipsec_gethist() in ip_input.c which you
mentioned was already replaced by ipsec_getnhist().  However, I didn't
noticed that ipsec_gethist() is called in ip_fw2.c.

ari>     (Apparently someone is merging things from kame
ari>     tree ?)

Yes, I did.

--
Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan
ume@mahoroba.org  ume@bisd.hitachi.co.jp  ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org
http://www.imasy.org/~ume/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?yge1xskfkta.wl%ume>