Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 4 Aug 1997 12:06:34 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Alex <garbanzo@hooked.net>
To:        Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Some thoughts and ideas, and quirks
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.970804120447.318C-100000@zippy.dyn.ml.org>
In-Reply-To: <199708041636.JAA04158@phaeton.artisoft.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Mon, 4 Aug 1997, Terry Lambert wrote:

> > That brings me to another thought or 5 ;) . What about an rc.modules?
> 
> Why not a /kern/modules instead, and use opendir() to iterate them,
> and demand load them when necessary?  I don't see a reason for rc.*
> based loading if demand-loading works...

That sounds like a great idea. Whatever works.
 
> > However the uid
> > filesystem thing does need to be statically compiled as does ext2, both
> > typos in the lint, and man pages, etc.
> 
> No.  Those are typos in the uid and ext2 FS code, not typos in LINT
> or the man pages.  Don't confuse bugs with policy.

Well bugs, typos or whatever, they still prevent them from being made into
lkms.  However I still don't see an ext2fs lkm or mount_ext2fs program
(unless it's hiding from me), and mount -t ext2fs did need the kernel
directive so afaic that's not really a typo.

- alex




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.970804120447.318C-100000>