Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 14:17:40 +0200 From: Florent Thoumie <flz@xbsd.org> To: Dan Langille <dan@langille.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports version upping policy? Message-ID: <1113308260.764.28.camel@innercity> In-Reply-To: <425B8307.10660.1C326DA9@localhost> References: <f6879d2c05041204121b11d319@mail.gmail.com> <425B8307.10660.1C326DA9@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-KeAigU+Qp8EjG502TkK6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le Mardi 12 avril 2005 =E0 08:12 -0400, Dan Langille a =E9crit : > On 12 Apr 2005 at 13:26, Florent Thoumie wrote: >=20 > > Yes, I've asked Dan Langille to add a special notice for these=20 > > ports so that people know they are unmaintained. Maybe we should > > think about it again. Dan ? >=20 > What sort of notice are you thinking of? "The maintainer of this port is ports@FreeBSD.org, that means=20 the port is currently unmaintained and that here may be delays=20 between port updates." Maybe you can add another note saying that mail sent to ports@=20 go to the freebsd-ports@ mailing list. I suggested this on IRC some weeks ago, didn't remember what was the final thought about this but it seems that's unclear to lots of people. --=20 Florent Thoumie flz@xbsd.org --=-KeAigU+Qp8EjG502TkK6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCW7xkMxEkbVFH3PQRAv91AJ0a8AP1o7siyMzOEvsnXHKau+67eACePkv1 vHtS3Kss7rLo+E/aWceWX4I= =rmyx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-KeAigU+Qp8EjG502TkK6--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1113308260.764.28.camel>