Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 15:42:55 +0100 From: John Marino <freebsd.contact@marino.st> To: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com>, marino@freebsd.org Cc: Cy Schubert <cy@FreeBSD.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, hrs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r400565 - head/security/pam_krb5 Message-ID: <5637766F.6000404@marino.st> In-Reply-To: <201511021437.tA2EbSnY069799@slippy.cwsent.com> References: <201511021437.tA2EbSnY069799@slippy.cwsent.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/2/2015 3:37 PM, Cy Schubert wrote:
>
> Looks like the tarball (port) never supported heimdal in ports in the first
> place. From ./configure:
Why did it build before then?
>
> ac_fn_c_check_member "$LINENO" "krb5_creds" "session"
> "ac_cv_member_krb5_creds_s
> ession" "
> #if HAVE_KRB5_H
> # include <krb5.h>
> #else
> # include <krb5/krb5.h>
> #endif
>
> ./portable/krb5.h has the same code.
>
> Hiemdal in ports installs krb5.h ${LOCALBASE}/include/heimdal/krb5. I can
> remove the option for now or (better) we can symlink
> ${LOCALBASE}/include/heimdal to ${LOCALBASE}/include/krb5 in the heimdal
> port. See attached patch.
Heimdal ports is the only option that builds in dports, so removing it
means removing it from dports.
krb.h is there (poudriere testport -i) :
# ls /usr/local/include/heimdal/krb5.h
/usr/local/include/heimdal/krb5.h
It should configure, right?
John
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5637766F.6000404>