From owner-freebsd-standards@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 1 15:18:03 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5F4C16A4CE for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 15:18:03 +0000 (GMT) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [128.30.28.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 308C343D39 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 15:18:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j31FHxaa084989 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK CN=khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu issuer=SSL+20Client+20CA); Fri, 1 Apr 2005 10:18:02 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id j31FHxTO084986; Fri, 1 Apr 2005 10:17:59 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2005 10:17:59 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <200504011517.j31FHxTO084986@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: Bruce Evans In-Reply-To: <20050401191850.Q24028@delplex.bde.org> References: <20050330181904.16519571@mobile.pittgoth.com> <20050331151908.498559bd@mobile.pittgoth.com> <20050401191850.Q24028@delplex.bde.org> X-Spam-Score: -19.8 () IN_REP_TO,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.37 cc: standards@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Patch for cp(1) X-BeenThere: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Standards compliance List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 15:18:03 -0000 < said: [cp -r] > I think we don't need to keep it except for POSIX compatibility. > New programs just shouldn't use cp -r. Old programs that use cp -r > shouldn't have its behaviour changed. I'm more concerned about humans. -GAWollman