From owner-freebsd-current Sat Mar 30 04:14:16 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id EAA03813 for current-outgoing; Sat, 30 Mar 1996 04:14:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from omega.physik.fu-berlin.de (omega.physik.fu-berlin.de [130.133.3.51]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id EAA03807 for ; Sat, 30 Mar 1996 04:14:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from mordillo (graichen.dialup.fu-berlin.de [160.45.217.183]) by omega.physik.fu-berlin.de (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id NAA06553 for ; Sat, 30 Mar 1996 13:14:00 +0100 (MET) Received: (from news@localhost) by mordillo (8.6.12/8.6.12) id KAA03012; Sat, 30 Mar 1996 10:48:45 +0100 To: current@FreeBSD.org Path: graichen From: graichen@omega.physik.fu-berlin.de (Thomas Graichen) Newsgroups: local.freebsd-current Subject: Re: We need to do another XFree86 release for -current someday soon.. Date: 30 Mar 1996 09:48:44 GMT Organization: his FreeBSD box :-) Lines: 21 Distribution: local Message-ID: <4jj01t$1mv@mordillo.physik.fu-berlin.de> References: <199603291819.MAA24109@compound> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.physik.fu-berlin.de X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Tony Kimball (alk@Think.COM) wrote: : From: Garrett Wollman : Date: Fri, 29 Mar 1996 10:04:24 -0500 : > Why do ns_addr() and iso_addr() have to go? What's the big deal? : Because the network address families they supported are no longer : shipped, and thus they won't compile any more. : Please, that isn't good enough to justify the cost. Stub them to : return errors. i would vote for this too t -- thomas graichen graichen@mail.physik.fu-berlin.de graichen@FreeBSD.org perfection is reached, not when there is no longer anything to add, but when there is no longer anything to take away antoine de saint-exupery