Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2012 20:49:31 +0100 From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> To: Andrey Zonov <andrey@zonov.org> Cc: Hiroki Sato <hrs@FreeBSD.org>, mark@mivok.net, net@FreeBSD.org, sem@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [CFT] multiple FIB support in route(8) Message-ID: <4F2EDD4B.3010307@quip.cz> In-Reply-To: <4F2ED535.40606@zonov.org> References: <20120205.033532.381149506660559829.hrs@allbsd.org> <4F2ED535.40606@zonov.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Andrey Zonov wrote: > Hi, > > What do you think about adding fib support for rc.subr like we got one > for nice? There are PRs with patches for rc.subr for a long time without attention. Same as with PR's adding suport for cpuset. I don't understand why we are having some really useful tools in base without support in rc.conf > On 04.02.2012 22:35, Hiroki Sato wrote: >> Hello, >> >> Can anyone review/test the attached patch to add "-fib number" option >> to route(8)? This should simplify static route configuration across >> multiple FIBs in rc.conf. Just adding an -fib option like the >> following will do the trick without changing rc.d/routing: >> >> static_routes="foo bar" >> route_foo="10.1.1.1/24 192.168.2.1 -fib 2" >> route_bar="10.1.1.1/24 192.168.2.1 -fib 3" >> >> The -fib option is supported in all subcommands but monitor. >> >> -- Hiroki
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F2EDD4B.3010307>