Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 19 Jun 2011 04:15:16 +0100
From:      Frank Shute <frank@shute.org.uk>
To:        Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de>
Cc:        FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Problems compiling 8-STABLE/amd64 system on Intel Core2 4300
Message-ID:  <20110619031516.GD21890@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20110619043839.b11b2559.freebsd@edvax.de>
References:  <20110619003230.07fe7f64.freebsd@edvax.de> <BANLkTikiW2u=zzhoGw6G0t2AGboWPNoPdg@mail.gmail.com> <20110619030510.f5e8f6b2.freebsd@edvax.de> <BANLkTimTwbL70EhjmRBizZcQfU3yje20Ag@mail.gmail.com> <20110619043839.b11b2559.freebsd@edvax.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--rqzD5py0kzyFAOWN
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 04:38:39AM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
>
> On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 20:52:06 -0500, Adam Vande More wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Polytropon <freebsd@edvax.de> wrote:
> >=20
> > > Seems that neither "core" and "core2" are fully supported. Which
> > > CPUTYPE should be used for Intel Core2 4300 then, or can it be
> > > omitted without problems?
> > >
> >=20
> > I've used core successfully for years.  Did you clean any potential
> > conflicts?=20
>=20
> I'm sure I did. I have a minimal /etc/make.conf and I also
> remove /usr/obj (and "make clean") before any new attempt.
>=20
>=20
> > What happens if you just comment out CPUTYPE for this run after
> > the clean out?
>=20
> I'm currently trying that, the build is still running. The
> system as been initially installed as 8.1 from CD #1, then
> upgraded to 8.2-PRERELEASE as of January 1st (from source),
> and that's the system that's currently performing the build
> process.
>=20
> After I have (hopefully) successfully installed latest 8-STABLE,
> I'll see if CPUTYPE=3Dcore or CPUTYPE=3Dcore2 will then work.
>=20
> Are there alternative CPUTYPEs for the CPU in question?
>=20

I've used "nocona" with my core2 with satisfactory results.

No idea if it produces faster code as I haven't tested.


Regards,

--=20

 Frank

 Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html



--rqzD5py0kzyFAOWN
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAk39acMACgkQHduKvUAgeK5l2ACgixgjRMQ4JxFafYuSl9PZQIzu
mqgAn1OXVwXilHb7Eta1S7rxyyZUmk1Z
=KnU7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--rqzD5py0kzyFAOWN--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110619031516.GD21890>