From owner-freebsd-gnome Wed Mar 5 20:37:29 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CAAE37B401 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 20:37:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from hotmail.com (f86.sea2.hotmail.com [207.68.165.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C719B43F93 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 20:37:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from reigncracks@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 5 Mar 2003 20:37:26 -0800 Received: from 68.103.32.11 by sea2fd.sea2.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 06 Mar 2003 04:37:26 GMT X-Originating-IP: [68.103.32.11] From: "Mezz bsdforums.org" To: gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GVim + GTK2 (was: Re: an apology...) Date: Wed, 05 Mar 2003 23:37:26 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Mar 2003 04:37:26.0517 (UTC) FILETIME=[16B42A50:01C2E39A] Sender: owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > > > > > Philip Paeps wrote: > > >If you like, I could host these for you. I think this would be a very >nice > > >addition to the ports-tree. I don't think I'm the only one who finds >GTK2 > > >to > > >look loads nicer than GTK1, and for many of us, vim is possibly the > > >application which gets most CPU time, so it might as well look good! >:-) >Mezz bsdforums.org wrote: > > Thanks, I am current in the touch with the author of vim-gtk2 patch >(David > > Elstner). Hope, he can create a new project of vim-gtk2 in the >SourceForge > > or whatever for a while. Until, it merges in the VIM CVS tree, then he >can > > close the project. If he doesn't want to do that, then don't worry about > > host. I will just ask for repo copy of editors/vim->vim-gtk2. I don't >know > > if I need to ask for that, because I only will copy the patch lines >part, > > but not the rest of Makefile. Do I still have to ask for the repo copy? Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: >If you are going to use any of obrien's work, a repo copy is in order. >If, however, you plan to make a slave port of vim, you don't need a repo >copy, but you should probably get in touch with obrien first. In fact, >contacting obrien might be a good idea either way. He may be amicable >to adding the patch to the current port. It teeters between CVS and >release with all the additional patches anyway. I will email to obrien and ask if he's working or planning or whatever. You are right, I should ask him. If he doesn't has any of plan, then I will ask for repo copy if David (the author of vim-gtk2) doesn't want to create a new project over at SourceForge or whatever. David told me that he is thinking about it and will let me know in the next email. >(Note, the GTK 2 patch does not apply to the current editor/vim :-( ). Oh bummer... Maybe, it has to be use the whole patches? The editors/vim doesn't grab the whole patches, btw. I will try to test patch the whole patch files, then patch the vim-gtk patch. Hope, it will work. Check at ftp://ftp.vim.org/pub/vim/patches/ , it has too many patches for 6.1.. :-| Can I do like backup vim->vim.orig, then use whole patches (above ftp link) to vim, then diff the vim and vim.org. After that, put like patch-aa in the vim-gtk2/files/? Rather than fetch the whole patches? Sorry, if I keep try to find the another way, because I do really think it's silly to fetch each patches. If there's no another good way, then the best result is to wait and patience, until vim-gtk2 merges in the VIM CVS tree. I don't mind to install them by myself, thought. Cheers, Mezz _________________________________________________________________ Help STOP SPAM with the new MSN 8 and get 2 months FREE* http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-gnome" in the body of the message