Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2017 23:58:04 +0200 From: Jan Beich <jbeich@FreeBSD.org> To: Mathieu Arnold <mat@mat.cc> Cc: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com>, Jason Unovitch <junovitch@FreeBSD.org>, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r416439 - head/sysutils/fusefs-ntfs Message-ID: <h927-iydv-wny@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <02a45cdf-904b-1306-5d93-4dcc82f39cea@mat.cc> (Mathieu Arnold's message of "Sat, 1 Apr 2017 23:40:24 %2B0200") References: <201704012020.v31KKM24033490@slippy.cwsent.com> <02a45cdf-904b-1306-5d93-4dcc82f39cea@mat.cc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mathieu Arnold <mat@mat.cc> writes: > Le 01/04/2017 =C3=A0 22:20, Cy Schubert a =C3=A9crit : > >> In message <201606052250.u55Mo44E016592@repo.freebsd.org>, Jason Unovitc= h=20 >> write >> s: >>> Author: junovitch >>> Date: Sun Jun 5 22:50:04 2016 >>> New Revision: 416439 >>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/416439 >>> >>> Log: >>> sysutils/fusefs-ntfs: pass MAINTAINER to submitter >>>=20=20=20 >>> PR: 209976 >>> Submitted by: Du=C3=85=C2=A1an Vejnovi=C3=84=C2=8D <freebsd@dussan.or= g> >> Is there a reason we grant maintainer on a simple maintainer request? It= =20 >> used to be that a MAINTAINER was given maintainership only when a patch = was=20 >> submitted not a patch to just change MAINTAINER. Has this policy changed? > > The policy has not changed, those commits should not happen, but, well, > they do. Where is this policy documented? I'm sure I've made the same mistake more than once in the past.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?h927-iydv-wny>