From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 17 02:37:23 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2416F16A4CE for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 02:37:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx1.mail.ru (mx1.mail.ru [194.67.23.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A378743D2D for ; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 02:37:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@mail.ru) Received: from [83.237.61.210] (port=3224 helo=[172.17.0.69]) by mx1.mail.ru with esmtp id 1CqMld-0002hw-00; Mon, 17 Jan 2005 05:37:21 +0300 Message-ID: <41EB24E1.5080506@mail.ru> Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 05:37:21 +0300 From: "Andrew P." User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stheg olloydson References: <20050117004256.33118.qmail@web53901.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20050117004256.33118.qmail@web53901.mail.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: Not detected cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: different behaviour between 4.x and 5.x (ping response/disk io) [was Re: ] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: infofarmer@mail.ru List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 02:37:23 -0000 stheg wrote: > P.S. (to the list in general) Why do all of the questions about FBSD > performance, especially 4.x vs 5.x, come from people posting from > Windows boxes? Theories? > Cuz if you have freebsd on your desktop, you don't give a damn about its performance. It's just too great. And don't look at me, I'm still waiting for SPDIF support in ALC658 driver to dump my last running Windows for good :-) Very best wishes, Andrew P.