From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jul 21 10:39:25 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B620BA09CD for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 10:39:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from herbert@mailbox.org) Received: from mx1.mailbox.org (mx1.mailbox.org [80.241.60.212]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.mailbox.org", Issuer "SwissSign Server Silver CA 2014 - G22" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DC5918C7 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 10:39:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from herbert@mailbox.org) Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org (smtp1.mailbox.org [80.241.60.240]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65C8143AE6 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 12:39:17 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=mailbox.org; h= content-type:content-type:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :subject:subject:from:from:message-id:date:date:received; s= mail20150812; t=1469097556; bh=hl8AKeBxcPpR6HrQ3svuevP2wl+AeW4i+ wlAOzfhSPk=; b=d9LEr0hQ9xV+p4bFZx1klSm62lEtwKzE3laggvv8/aENhU5jA bxQMDZaDKtGdb5Bj21mI1LRWU9YI7tBDmt8Qu5pHISCdLvtawd8gLaIef04eSG8H 9Ut4y218joVxvDKvPcQNglu1jlIKcOP1G0srFZ2cHgpgu4diTs1/TInoxYTIVIFe fPTPQsUKatefzBVnHAs4chiOnJN2fhzrVFNV4mb3T/UTOlhPqXjjxc3tnLD+FkB2 IwPKZQqvRKvoM9ozJhgO9skG9uwleKRfTDZXgcB3vP+jaxo8TSTI3D2pg85oWStT vNRo+xBD+0bkwTpbtl8cnPV3eTc28zFWAzUkA== X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at heinlein-support.de Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org ([80.241.60.240]) by hefe.heinlein-support.de (hefe.heinlein-support.de [91.198.250.172]) (amavisd-new, port 10030) with ESMTP id E0Ow8dphxO7n for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2016 12:39:16 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 12:39:14 +0200 Message-ID: <86twfjjmwd.wl-herbert@mailbox.org> From: "Herbert J. Skuhra" To: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: Is there still broken lang/ruby23 ? In-Reply-To: <20160630071440.GF79889@home.opsec.eu> References: <201606282212.u5SMCDQU079882@kx.openedu.org> <407b9391-86f0-4305-8bc3-3d5b21aacab3@FreeBSD.org> <20160630071440.GF79889@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 10:39:25 -0000 Kurt Jaeger skrev: > > Hi! >> Kazuhiko> Is there still broken lang/ruby23[1]. Or can build in latest >> Kazuhiko> 11.0-* ? >> >> Kazuhiko> [1] http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.devel.pkg-fallout/294364 >> >> swills> Yes, I haven't looked at it yet, but if you want to take a look, I'd >> swills> welcome patches. >> >> Could you put the attached two patches into lang/ruby23/files and give >> it a try? > > Testbuild on 11a (r302198M) on a loaded host was OK, but make check-plist found > > bin/erb > > missing. I'll now test poudriere. Any update on this issue? With this patch build works for me on FreeBSD 11.0-BETA1 amd64 (r303012). # make check-plist ====> Checking for pkg-plist issues (check-plist) ===> Parsing plist ===> Checking for items in STAGEDIR missing from pkg-plist ===> Checking for items in pkg-plist which are not in STAGEDIR ===> No pkg-plist issues found (check-plist) Thanks. -- Herbert