Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 17 Oct 2011 14:10:03 -0700
From:      Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
To:        "Philip M. Gollucci" <pgollucci@p6m7g8.com>
Cc:        cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/audio/squeezeboxserver Makefile ports/databases/fireprofile Makefile ports/databases/gtksql Makefile ports/databases/mysql-connector-odbc Makefile ports/databases/mysql-proxy Makefile ports/databases/mysql-udf Makefile ...
Message-ID:  <4E9C99AB.9040106@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4E9C9602.9090102@p6m7g8.com>
References:  <201110170435.p9H4Z3Hs011331@repoman.freebsd.org> <4E9C9602.9090102@p6m7g8.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/17/2011 13:54, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
> 
>> http://cvsweb.FreeBSD.org/ports/databases/fireprofile/Makefile.diff?r1=1.9&r2=1.10&f=h
>> | --- ports/databases/fireprofile/Makefile	2008/04/19 17:47:10	1.9
>> | +++ ports/databases/fireprofile/Makefile	2011/10/17 04:34:59	1.10
>> | @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
>> |  # Date created:		Mon 13 May 15:00:00 WST 2002
>> |  # Whom:			Dean Hollister <dean@odyssey.apana.org.au>
>> |  #
>> | -# $FreeBSD: /usr/local/www/cvsroot/FreeBSD/ports/databases/fireprofile/Makefile,v 1.9 2008/04/19 17:47:10 miwi Exp $
>> | +# $FreeBSD: /usr/local/www/cvsroot/FreeBSD/ports/databases/fireprofile/Makefile,v 1.10 2011/10/17 04:34:59 dougb Exp $
>> |  #
>> |  
>> |  PORTNAME=	fireprofile
>> | @@ -23,8 +23,6 @@ PLIST_FILES=	lib/libfireprofile.so.0 lib
>> |  
>> |  USE_LDCONFIG=	yes
>> |  USE_MYSQL=	yes
>> | -DEFAULT_MYSQL_VER=	323
>> | -WANT_MYSQL_VER=	323
> I'd be shocked if this one still builds with the newer .h files.

Me too, but the maintainer was previously unresponsive about other
issues with the port, so I strongly suspect that it will just rot until
it's eventually removed.

The current situation is no worse than it was before I removed those
lines since 323 was marked FORBIDDEN; and I took the action I did in the
hopes that perhaps someone who wants to use the port will be interested
enough to fix it.

Of course, I could be wrong about all that, so if the PTB want to make
changes, go for it. :)


Doug

-- 

	Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
			-- OK Go

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E9C99AB.9040106>