From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Oct 15 23:57:29 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60CC0E28209 for ; Sun, 15 Oct 2017 23:57:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@woodcruft.co.uk) Received: from a-painless.mh.aa.net.uk (a-painless.mh.aa.net.uk [81.187.30.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 262B36574D for ; Sun, 15 Oct 2017 23:57:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@woodcruft.co.uk) Received: from woodcruft.co.uk ([81.187.27.248] helo=lime.woodcruft.co.uk) by a-painless.mh.aa.net.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1e3smd-0003aX-Lr; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 00:57:27 +0100 Received: by lime.woodcruft.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id BB57F3D165; Mon, 16 Oct 2017 00:57:21 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 00:57:21 +0100 From: Frank Shute To: Jon Radel Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unbound(8) caching resolver no workie on fresh install :-( Message-ID: <20171015235721.GB4360@woodcruft.co.uk> Reply-To: Frank Shute Mail-Followup-To: Jon Radel , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4172.1507827505@segfault.tristatelogic.com> <20171015172640.GA4360@woodcruft.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="JP+T4n/bALQSJXh8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Face: *}~{PHnDTzvXPe'wl_-f%!@+r5; VLhb':*DsX%wEOPg\fDrXWQJf|2\,92"DdS%63t*BHDyQ|OWo@Gfjcd72eaN!4%NE{0]p)ihQ1MyFNtWL X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.1-RELEASE-p1 amd64 X-Organisation: 'woodcruft.co.uk' X-PGP-Key: http://woodcruft.co.uk/misc/pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2017 23:57:29 -0000 --JP+T4n/bALQSJXh8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 04:30:25PM -0400, Jon Radel wrote: > > On 10/15/17 13:26, Frank Shute wrote: > > the local IP of the box unbound is running on. ie. a local (what > > used to be known as a 'Class C') address: 192.168.*.* or 10.*.*.* or > > 176...etc.=20 > > No, still known as a private or RFC 1918 address.=A0 Class C is something > quite different.=A0 As a matter of fact, >=20 > 192.168.0.0/16 is 256 Class Cs > 172.16.0.0/12 is 16 Class Bs > 10.0.0.0/8 is 1 Class A Thanks for putting me straight Jon. From now on I'll use the correct nomenclature. I can remember the number of that RFC. >=20 > You are completely correct, however, that this is mainly of historical > interest and has no immediate impact.=A0 Even when RFC 1918 was published, > referring to the addresses classes was referred to as an essentially > obsolete "pre-CIDR notation." >=20 > To bring some substance to this comment:=A0 changing 172.16.0.0/12 to > "176...etc" is just asking for trouble, being wrong. Quite right. My memory is not as good as I thought and in future I will check my 'facts'. We shouldn't have to know all this stuff nowadays as we're all meant to have moved to IPv6 aren't we? ;) >=20 > --=20 > --Jon Radel > jon@radel.com >=20 >=20 Regards,=20 --=20 Frank --JP+T4n/bALQSJXh8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEXRpQZWMUMC1nxphkORvOAPtvi1oFAlnj9cEACgkQORvOAPtv i1pO6w//Zkodx8ZMyihJidwOB2EmOk47jodx5ev1cRVJJmFIVZeySWYRTeOux7iH WHJZ52wVRnSXQdQaY0hAe18m4MQbK78vfjQ1iXAIrrH2aqQAMAOS8GkR49/mM6E7 fZeY6gKQeFn23TyEqeeIqEaTLs/y4jbVSQreQkjGMsVgJw8HD3URGorFTKsVMa+s C6RVeFNxItlJw3wy5i182aktXjnH3mUHKMyvZCRAyjrLLko2pH4HDks85E6lZjAC Ok7lPVdJ3vpJ8BI2TmzX9rRz+ojy1wGaMP+8bvbvCpjedThgv72z2hDTxK2wZ18n xlgO0MUfFGCl1LwofUHnkOy4et8WtKDpBTEQZ58e/r+RBcn4yMC479LUMVp/VzW3 OhvPu1xIavUiHsayLl2HIhj81OAvq+pSnHB1cht1GDFQ/DAGAxoN1v6xjk9dqRq4 VnMFwS0VxZbg4Bit2Y8uEM3P6AwUvXWPb2bBHlwgjvemGRZnC8zcx5s2ScCirBv3 B80pZvrTDx/ROexaaY4UbjU43wttD0WUGopmVPvppP1T4x+zuys62S8m5V4naEY8 6wtPSWO3rxqrR8uHZcjnqay6qK++UROau6c2X2tiSdfkvdJWRfIu6jI9/z8u7uj0 xZukwC1NlRYYwOAGaQGb7QN5S0e+m6DuV4qHLNQmAsJdy4OJvSk= =B5bT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --JP+T4n/bALQSJXh8--