Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 10 Jan 2018 10:48:22 -0600
From:      Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com>
To:        Luciano Mannucci <luciano@vespaperitivo.it>
Cc:        FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: 10.4 RELEASE sees only one core
Message-ID:  <CA+tpaK1vpKK1xxndG759mh+sLKDWYmYzteupXbSF0mFfP4CvHw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <3zGtBY1tjWz3jYyh@baobab.bilink.it>
References:  <3zGnrf2wGvz3jYpX@baobab.bilink.it> <CA+tpaK2xNqGoNmUsw7PpWoSagSh8bCSZXijn+6ULOWHsEiW6Nw@mail.gmail.com> <3zGtBY1tjWz3jYyh@baobab.bilink.it>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 9:25 AM, Luciano Mannucci <luciano@vespaperitivo.it>
wrote:

> On Wed, 10 Jan 2018 08:30:23 -0600
> Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I think 11.x is better at this but:
> Why? The Xeon E5410 went End Of Life in Q4 2010. Maybe the 9.something
> looks more apropriate... :)
>

It has nothing do with your CPU which in and of itself is fully supported
in 10.x


> BTW, thanks I've missed that:
> > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2014-May/050353.html
>
> tough I have only 8 cores in total, which seems to me way under 64.
>

I think you assume too much by taking the var name literally.

-- 
Adam



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA+tpaK1vpKK1xxndG759mh+sLKDWYmYzteupXbSF0mFfP4CvHw>